Sep 18, 2023·edited Sep 24, 2023Liked by Nate Lawrence
Could the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics be wrong? I think the existence of the Sun implies it is. Even if the Sun burns out in like 8 billion years, that has zero impact on current calculations. In essence, there is a free lunch in nature, because plants will always convert sunlight into sugar. Life becomes more ordered as it ages, not less, as you and Dr. Peat so eloquently explained - the opposite of inanimate objects
Could the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics be wrong? I think the existence of the Sun implies it is. Even if the Sun burns out in like 8 billion years, that has zero impact on current calculations. In essence, there is a free lunch in nature, because plants will always convert sunlight into sugar. Life becomes more ordered as it ages, not less, as you and Dr. Peat so eloquently explained - the opposite of inanimate objects